Want to read with me? Follow this link to view the list and pick a book (or a few!) to read along with me. I'd love for this project to be collaborative, and will post anyone's thoughts beside my own.

Monday, December 20, 2021

Ah, I have heard of a Revolution, but I have been too busy in my life to attend to it. There was always the land.

 The Good Earth by Pearl S. Buck

Spoiler Alert: Plot Summary

The Good Earth chronicles the life of a peasant farmer, Wang Lung, in rural China in the early 1900s. When we first encounter him, he is living with his father on a small plot of land, and has just decided to 'take a wife'. He goes and gets a slave from the House of Hwang, a well-to-do house in town, and takes her home to be his wife. Her name is O-lan. We follow the pair through decades together, with Wang Lung continually focused on getting more land and doing what is necessary to feed his growing family. O-lan bears him several children, and after a stint in the south when they must beg for food for weeks, they get a windfall from looting during an uprising, and return to the north and buy more land. 

Wang Lung continues to expand his land and becomes a wealthy man, and his wealth attracts others to him, including an unwanted uncle and his family. Wang Lung can't get rid of the leeching uncle because it turns out he works with the Redbeards, a clan of looters/raiders, and has been secretly protecting Wang Lung, so Wang Lung decides to turn the uncle and his family onto opium use. Wang Lung becomes dissatisfied with O-lan and buys a concubine, Lotus, from a teahouse in town, and moves her into his estate. O-lan eventually falls ill and Wang Lung feels guilty, caring for her until she dies. His children are continually dissatisfied with what he provides them, and make plans to sell his land when he dies, much to his chagrin. The final scene ends with Wang Lung begging them not to sell the land, and them promising they won't, but smiling behind his back.

Spoiler Over: Continue Here

HOKAY, blobbists, it has been a minute. I will freely admit that in my attempt to make a more inclusive second list, I included more women, but I realize that this did not account for the issue of people writing stories that aren't their own, so I ended up with books like this, which were groundbreaking at the time, but also problematic. 

So. I read the book anyway, because I want to make relationships with all books that are my own, not founded on anyone else's opinion, and I will share some interesting reflections that I came across in the 'reader's excerpt' in the middle. 

In case it was not obvious to you/you did not know, Pearl S. Buck was a white lady from America, born to missionary parents, who was raised largely in China. Some people thought that it was super swell that she told the world all about agrarian life in China, but lots of other people were like, hey, lady - that's not your story! And also, that's not all of China! (This is a DRAMATIC oversimplification, I am aware.) Here are some interesting niblets I found in my copy that I found enlightening (and which I read, true to my form, after reading the book, as I didn't want to be influenced by context). 

From a NY Times Book Review, from Professor Kiang Kang-Hu, of China

Her portrait of China may be quite faithful from her own point of view, but she certainly paints China with a half-black and half-white face, and the official button is missing! Furthermore, she seems to enjoy more depicting certain peculiarities and even defects than presenting ordinary human figures, each in its proper proportions. She capitalizes such points, intensifies them, and sometimes 'dumps' too many and too much of their kind on one person, making that person almost impossible in real life. In this respect Mrs. Buck is more of a caricature cartoonist than a portrait painter. 

As long as a Western cannot himself or herself read Chinese texts and, as long as he or she depends chiefly on Chinese coolies and amahs as the source of information and as first-hand translators, there is little hope left for him or her to really understand and truly interpret China, even though he or she be born and live always in China.

 This felt really apt after reading the story - it was like reading Uncle Tom's Cabin, in that the characters had movement and feeling, but they were also caricatures of human beings, in a way that had deeply harmful potential for stereotyping and ongoing ignorance of a broader range of experience. I also want to point out that he uses some derogatory terms that aren't OK in today's parlance (coolie), so he's got some classism going on there as well. Here's Ms. Buck's response to this way of thinking, from a speech she gave: 

One of the isolating factors of my own experience has been that some of the morbidly sensitive modern Chinese, especially those abroad in foreign countries, have not liked it that I have written of the everyday life of their people. In China itself it was accepted without dislike except that it was a foreigner who wrote it. It was often said there, 'It is a book which a Chinese should have written.' Apparently with the simplest purpose in the world, namely, merely to write novels, surely a harmless necessity for a novelist, and without any sense of wrongdoing, I was able to infuriate an astonishingly large number of people. 

This statement was CRINGEWORTHY for me to read as a white woman in the 21st century. She's basically saying, hey, I was just writing a book, and I had totally good intentions, so that's enough, right? I can understand that living in China for so much of her life made it it a rife subject for her fiction writing, but my main concern (of many concerns, tbqh) is that she is nowhere to be found in this book, and it's a work of fiction that was clearly taken as nonfiction/a study or portrait of life in China. 

Now I don't think you have to base all fiction in yourself because that's nonsense, but I do feel like she sort of sat across the room from her experience in China and wrote about what she saw on the wall in the way that a photographer does, which means that she could only see things through her Westerner, missionary lens. It feels like Buck really failed to capture nuance, and when she should have drawn in pencil, she used a Sharpie. And of course, because of the way our society works and because of racism and imperialism and oppression, she got a Nobel prize for doing it. Because when you feed into the system of oppression you get a cookie. I also just feel like she missed this amazing opportunity to take a risk and really tackle her OWN subject material; what was her experience like straddling these worlds? How did she create her own identity? 

Anyway, I will now respond to the book itself, with the disclaimer that I am responding to the book as a work of fiction, not as a representation of Chinese life. I have also walked away from this experience realizing that I must add Chinese fiction authors to my list, as I am woefully lacking in this area. Understandably I will have to read translations, but there's still a WIDE world to discover.

It starts with a Proust quote...

So Ms. Buck started off with a Proust quote. And you all know I love me some Proust. But I just didn't really understand why it was there, or what it had to do with the novel At. All. It was a quote about the little phrase, for the Proustians out there, and I just couldn't for the life of me see what it had to do with Wang Lung's experience or life. If you're going to use a quote (and especially a Proust quote) make it connect!

Casual misogyny

Again, this is a response to the representation in the novel, not Chinese life writ large. 

It was hard to read this book, as generally in this narrative, woman = slave. O-lan is literally a slave who is sold to Wang Lung, and repeatedly throughout the book, women are property, not people, but they are also expected to be superhuman. I suppose in some way Ms. Buck was trying to highlight this contradiction, but it still ended up reading as cringeworthy to me.

Here are some examples of this misogyny/where woman also = badass. Note, I'm using 'the woman' for effect, not to de-humanize her.

  • When the woman (O-lan) stops in the middle of her labor to prepare Wang Lung dinner.
  • When the woman (O-lan) works beside her husband in the fields and also keeps the house and home, throughout the duration of her many pregnancies.
  • When the woman (O-lan) kills their ox to feed their family because Wang Lung can't bring himself to do it.
  • When the woman (O-lan) bears him child after child after child, despite being starving herself.
  • When the woman (Wang Lung's daughter) does not weep, though she is in pain from foot binding:

'Now I have not heard you weep,' he said wondering. 
'No,' she said simply, 'and my mother said I was not to weep aloud because you are too kind and weak for pain and you might say to leave me as I am, and then my husband would not love me even as you do not love her.'
When O-lan has been sick for months and he doesn't see it
Poor O-lan, who is the REAL protagonist of this story, gets sick and increasingly sicker and basically no one (including Wang Lung) notices. Here's his response to himself:
'Well, and it is not my fault if I have not loved her as one loves a concubine, since men do not.' And to himself he said for comfort, 'I have not beat her and I have given her silver when she asked for it.'
Oh yes, Wang Lung, that's such a high bar. Not beating her and giving her silver when she asks. This is one of those Sharpie examples - how many foreigners walked away from this novel assuming that most Chinese peasants beat their wives? We're clearly meant to believe that Wang Lung is unique in this regard. 

The land
For Wang Lung, everything comes back to the land, and I have to say that this is a place that really touched me. I know that land ownership is complex given that much of the land currently occupied was taken from other peoples. There is, however, something so pure and affirming about having a plot of land to farm and create the food you need to survive. This part of Wang Lung was something I loved and connected with, but it felt like no amount of land was ever enough, which I guess was his fatal flaw. The book is full of lines like, "We must get back to the land." and "As long as there was the land!" 

When O-lan wants to keep the pearls
O-lan finds a stash of jewels in the looting post-uprising, and while she gives them over to Wang Lung, she asks if she can keep a pair of pearls. When he asks her what she would do with them, she says, simply: 

I could hold them in my hand sometimes. This line killed me. Wang Lung (being the asshole that he is) later takes the pearls from her to spend on his concubine, I think.

No food to eat vs. no food
This was a fascinating realization/heartbreaking understanding to reckon with that came up in this book. Wang Lung and his family have to leave their land and go south to beg for food at one point, because there is simply no food to be had in the country in the north. I guess I don't spend a lot of time thinking about the different ways one can be food insecure, and as a westerner in a very wealthy country who lives in a city, I'm used to the idea that food of some kind exists somewhere. But at several points, Wang Lung and his family are starving, or trying to make dirt or a few beans stretch for days of sustenance, because there is simply no other food to be had. Here's a line that I thought captured this eloquently:
Wang Lung and his family had come from a country where if men starve it is because there is no food, since the land cannot bear under a relentless heaven. Silver in the hand was worth little because it could buy nothing where nothing was. 
The place where a mother used to be
So like I said, O-lan was the real hero of this novel, and it unfortunately takes her being on her deathbed for the rest of the family to realize it. I was also reading 'Crying in H Mart' while I read this book, and it was a beautiful counterpoint, as it deals with a daughter's grief and attempting to fill the space her mother did. I know I would be LOST without my own mother, and I'm so grateful for all the times she has made comfort and continues to make comfort for me and my sisters. Love you, mom!
All through the long months of winter she lay dying and upon her bed, and for the first time Wang Lung and his children knew what she had been in the house, and how she had made comfort for them all and they had not known it.
Words New to Me
geomancer -  a method of divination that interprets markings on the ground or the patterns formed by tossed handfuls of soil, rocks, or sand.

Lines I Liked

  • A small soft wind blew gently from the east, a wind mild and murmurous and full of rain. God, I loved this line. This was probably my favorite line in the whole book.
  • Hunger makes thief of any man.
  • Wang Lung was afraid of his happiness.
  • Everything seemed not so good to him as it was before.

Well, blobbists, I'm off to read Vanity Fair, and add more Chinese authors to my ongoing list. Feel free to shoot me recommendations! 

I'll leave you with this tidbit, which is a note from Ms. Buck which I quite liked. 

I am always glad when any of my books can be put into an inexpensive edition, because I like to think that any people who might wish to read them can do so. Surely books ought to be within the reach of everybody.

On this, Pearl, we can agree! Books should be within the reach of everybody! Happy holidays blobbists, whatever you are celebrating, and I'll see you in the new year! Keep safe, and keep faith! 

Monday, November 29, 2021

Don't you know that putting yourself in the position for disaster is the surest way in the world to bring it about?

 Sanctuary by William Faulkner

Spoiler Alert: Plot Summary

Sanctuary is a story about risks, calculated and unforeseen. It centers around Horace Benbow, a lawyer in the American South (in Faulkner's fictional Yoknapatawpha County, Mississippi) in the later part of the era of Prohibition (1920 to 1933 is the window for that, in case you, like I, were unsure) and his eventually failed attempt to prove a bootlegger innocent of a murder he didn't commit. 

At the center of the case is Temple Drake, a debutante who happens into a situation at the bootlegger's farm where she is very much in the wrong place at the wrong time. Left to fend for herself by a drunken beau and spend the night at this rather unruly 'home', Temple tries and fails to prevent herself from being raped. A man, Tommy, is killed as he attempts to protect her. Popeye, one of the bootlegger's men, is responsible, but the bootlegger, Lee Goodwin, takes the blame. 

Popeye kidnaps Temple, takes her to Memphis, and makes her his 'kept woman'/sex slave, and since he's impotent, he brings another man, Red, in to do the deed with Temple while he watches. Horace eventually finds Temple and gets the real story out of her, including some rather disgusting parts where the (as it turns out) impotent Popeye used a corn cob in place of his penis, but when the case comes to trial, Red is dead (killed by Popeye), Popeye is long gone, and for reasons unbeknownst to us, Temple points the finger at Goodwin. 

In the end, the town is outraged over the incident, and Goodwin is found guilty and set to hang. Impatient for justice, a mob lights the jailhouse on fire and burns it down with Goodwin inside. Popeye is arrested on his way to visit his mother in Florida for killing a policeman (aka the one man he didn't actually murder in this story) and is hanged for the supposed crime. In the final scene, we see Temple strolling the streets of Paris with her father, seemingly unconcerned.

Spoiler Over: Continue Here

Dear blobbers, 

Once again, I feel as though I have taken quite some time to blob for you. But then again, Doris said, don't blob in a rush! So no rushing here, just a slow and steady pace. 

I did not care for this book. I found it less confusing than other Faulkners, but also less lyrical, and less satisfying. I think this is the fourth Faulkner I've read. I'm not sure why I chose it for this second list, to be totally honest, but I finished it and so I will share my thoughts with you! As always, make your own decisions about where to devote your reading time, but I can't say I'd personally recommend you spend yours on this particular tome. 

I would like to congratulate myself on understanding correctly what happened in the novel, despite Faulkner's best efforts to the contrary. I think this is the first Faulkner I read where my understanding of the events was actually the same as the internet's conception of the events. I really don't like writers that make you work that hard to assess what the words you read actually mean. I'm sure it's some amazing stylistic technique, and I'm just too uncultured to appreciate its brilliance, but I feel like the book should at Least meet you halfway. Now, here are my thoughts, in lighly alphabetical order. 

On places you shouldn't be after dark

One that that I did really like about this book was the setting of the bootlegger's abandoned mansion/farm. It felt wonderfully creepy, and when several people started telling Temple and her beau, Gowan, that they shouldn't be there when dark fell, reminded me of The Haunting of Hill House and stories like The Fall of the House of Usher. Here are two lines I liked: 

  • A moment later, above a black, jagged mass of trees, the house lifted its stark square bulk against the failing sky.
  • The gaunt ruin of the house rose against the sky, above the massed and matted cedars, lightless, desolate, and profound.

On prohibition, and how weird it seems to me now

I'm sure that as time passes, many things that made sense, or at least had clear origins, seem nonsensical to us in the present. Prohibition is one of those things to me. I'm not surprised we had antiquated and Puritanical alcohol laws, but the fact that we went so far as to ban it completely, and only for 13 years did so, seems positively wild to me. Faulkner was 23 to 36 during that time, so I suppose it's no wonder that it features so heavily in some of his works. Maybe it seemed wild to him, too. ;)

On punctuation, which is apparently only sometimes necessary (and maybe reeks of male white privilege?)

So, this wasn't my first Faulkner or anything, but I can't say that Ive ever come around to the way he writes. See how much that missing apostrophe bothers you?! I can barely stand to leave it in for dramatic effect! I understand the stream of consciousness technique, but I really fail to see how a dropped apostrophe here and there makes the work feel more like it fits that style. Honestly, it sort of feels lazy and careless to me, and I get that he was this epic, groundbreaking author and all, but would a woman or a writer of color get away with that and be lauded as GROUNDbreaking for violating basic rules of punctuation? I'll just leave you to marinate on that while you read this (obnoxious) example.

'You can get a better criminal lawyer than you are. She wont know it. She wont even care. Cant you see that she is just leading you on to get him out of jail for nothing? Dont you know that woman has got money hidden away somewhere? You're going back into town tomorrow, are you?' She turned, began to dissolve into the blackness. 'You wont leave before breakfast.' Faulkner's biography title: To Apostrophe, or Not to Apostrophe

On racism, misogyny, and anti-semiticism

It ALMOST goes without saying that when one is reading Faulkner, one must be prepared for a not insignificant amount of this delightful trio. And I know that we can't assign present-day expectations to figures of the past. But I CAN and WILL just go ahead and say that there's a LOT of these three things in this book, and I didn't feel like there was a ton of irony in the way Faulkner's characters expressed them. 

On rapes, and in particular, missing when they happen in literature

To be clear, I do not in any way wish to downplay the intensity, the trauma, the deep emotional, physical, and psychological hurt of a rape. I will say, though, that apparently I am not terribly skilled at picking them up when they happen in famous works of literature. When this one happened, the wording was so oblique that I honestly thought that Temple had just narrowly AVOIDED being raped, when in fact it was the exact opposite. Perhaps this is once again due to the Puritanical nature of American writing, and the desire not to sensationalize the reader, but it sailed right over my head.

On sanctuary, schmanctuary

I'm really not sure where the sanctuary was in this book. I suppose you could argue that Horace gives sanctuary to the bootlegger's common law wife and her baby while he's in jail; or you could say that the bootlegger mansion is a kind of sanctuary from the strict Puritanical world; or you could say that Temple ultimately finds sanctuary in a kind of fictionalization of her experience; or that sanctuary is to be found in justice ultimately prevailing on Popeye? OR MAYBE you could just say that it wasn't really clear why the novel was named that, because it didn't feel like there was any sanctuary for Temple when she needed it. 

On telling you things you need to know AFTER you needed to know them

Not much to say here, other than that Faulkner really likes to do this, and I really like to HATE when Faulkner does this. Like how I didn't really know what happened to Red, and then the next chapter was his funeral, and like halfway through that chapter Faulkner reveals that Red died. Oh, well isn't that HELPFUL information? I guess we're not on the 'need-to-know' list.

On Temple, who isn't the main character (but should be, imho)

I think one of the things that confused and upset me about this book was that even though it supposedly centers on Temple's experience, she isn't what I would call the main character. Horace Benbow, the lawyer, is the main character - the book opens with him and his story, and the action seems to end with him returning to the wife and stepdaughter he left temporarily. Sure, Temple is there, but she really just feels like a puppet whose strings Faulkner is pulling, and that left me feeling kind of icky, tbh. It felt like he wanted to write a story about rape and sensational creepy violation, but he didn't want to actually reckon with her full experience. I did like that we got to hear her rendition of the night's events, and I thought it was fascinating the way she kept distracting herself by believing she was going to, at any moment, turn into a boy and render herself protected. It made me feel both epically sad that being a woman made you that vulnerable in that time, and equally sad that women are still so vulnerable and unsafe in so many ways and places and spaces, especially if they identify as WOC, Trans, or Trans WOC. 

Lines I Liked

  • His back still shook with secret glee. 
  • You can feel people in a dark room: did you know that? You don't have to see them.
  • The insects had fallen to a low monotonous pitch, everywhere, nowhere, spent, as though the sound were the chemical agony of a world left stark and dying above the tide-edge of the fluid in which it lived and breathed.

Referents and Reverberations

Horace has a sister named Narcissa, which of course made me think of Draco's mom, Narcissa Malfoy, in the HP series. 

All the King's Men - In general, this novel reminded me a lot of that one, in the kind of languorous Southern space that it created and the evil underbelly we peel back. 

Tess of the D'Urbervilles - So, it reminded me of this book because it is another example of when a rape in literature went right over my head. I think in that one it was something about the flower or the blossom or the seed, and I was like, oh, ok, gardening, and then in the next chapter, she was pregnant, and I was like, WAIT, How?! Again. Rape is not a laughing matter, but apparently I am not that adept at spying it in the world of fiction. 

Well blobbists, I hope that you are tucked in somewhere cozy tonight, and that you are able to enjoy some reading time, whatever book you've chosen to tackle. I'm off to The Good Earth, and hopefully I'll be back here in not quite so long a spell. 

Keep safe! Keep faith! Good night.

Tuesday, September 14, 2021

She wanted something to happen - something, anything; she did not know what.

 The Awakening by Kate Chopin

Spoiler Alert: Plot Summary

The Awakening is a story of love lost, regained, and lost again. But more than that, it is a story of self-exploration, an examination of the female experience, and a warrior's battle cry. It chronicles a brief period of time in the life of Edna Pontellier, a relatively young woman and mother of two, first at Grand Isle, Louisiana, and later in New Orleans, in the early 20th century. As the novel begins, we're joining a group of wealthy families (self-designated as Creole, but in a sense that mostly refers to them having been descended from French folk and living in the American South, which I found a bit confusing, thinking that Creole had a racial aspect/designation) as they summer by the Gulf of Mexico. Edna is followed at every turn by Robert Lebrun, a young single man and son of another family staying there. The summer is full of lightness and affection, but when they return for the season to New Orleans, Robert announces his intention to move to Mexico to seek job prospects. Edna is dismayed, but can't convince Robert to stay. 

After Robert leaves, Edna begins to 'awaken', so to speak. She sends her children to be with her mother-in-law, she decides she does not wish to be tethered to anyone, and she tells her husband she intends to close their large home (he is away for work) and move into a small house adjacent to live by herself. Her husband is confused and displeased, but manages to smooth things over socially by claiming they are doing 'major repairs' on their home, and assumes/hopes she will eventually return to 'normal'. Edna develops a new friendship with another single man, Alcée Arobin, who falls completely in love with Edna. She enjoys his affections, but her heart is still longing for Robert, so poor Arobin slots into a sort of sad second place. Robert unexpectedly returns, but he spurns Edna, and she is bereft. She accidentally stumbles upon him and tries to rekindle their flame. It seems like they might be getting back together, but Robert leaves in the night and says he can't accept this limited version of Edna's affection (she would stay married, be his mistress but not his wife, etc.). Edna travels back to Grand Isle to "see the sights" in the off-season, and goes for a solo swim in the Gulf from which she does not return.

Spoiler Over: Continue Here

Dear blobbies, 

Do you like my new name for you? Blobbies? Ah well, I like it, so that's all that matters. ;) Anyway, I thought I'd continue my latest phase of actually reading books in a timely fashion and so I've already finished The Awakening and I'm ready to blob on it. 

General reflections: I liked this novel a lot. I remember that I once had the opportunity to read it in high school - I think it was a choice between this book and Portrait of a Lady and I kind of wish I'd read this book instead (sorry, Henry James). This book had tons of flavor and nuance to it, and I always LOVE reading books by women or female-identifying authors, especially when they're from a time when almost no women were getting published. Apparently this book was not well received when she wrote it, and lots of folks were like, "ladies don't/shouldn't act this way" which makes me feel like they really missed the point. So anyway, just want it to go down in the record that I see you, Kate Chopin, and I loved this book. I think it's gotten a fair amount of acclaim in later years post-publication, but I'm sure it's frustrating to not have your work feel seen when you're alive and there to stand by it. 

My thoughts!

On sunshades (and how we should bring them back)

Mr. Pontellier uses a sunshade and several people reference them, and I was like, UM hello can we please bring these back? I walked around the bird refuge with an open umbrella in the middle of the summer to protect my oh-so-pale skin from the sun and everyone looked at me like I was a nutbar.

Connection points

As I've mentioned in many of my last posts, I'm always amazed at how connected I feel to books, regardless of when they're written or by whom. This book was no exception. Here are a few of those links I saw in this one. 

  • Am I reading a book or taking a French exam? Amusingly, the copy of the book I bought was an inexpensive version from Amazon, and there is a ton of French in the novel, but it was all missing accents. So as I was reading, I kept trying to add in accents where I thought they were missing (an accent aigu here, accent grave there, circonflexe there) but it ultimately felt like I was taking a French exam. This reminded me of the fact that my mother used to write letters to her grandmother in French, but instead of responding in French, my great-grandmother would return the letters or notes with corrections. I must say that I was, on the whole, quite glad that I was a French speaker as I read this book, as it had a ton of untranslated French in it.
  • Perhaps a bit of bouillon? At one point, Mrs. Pontellier is looking tired, and someone offers her a cup of bouillon, and I just about dropped my book. My grandmother when she wasn't feeling well used to ask for 'just a bit of bouillon', and I legitimately thought this was just one of her things. Turns out, the whole world used to ask for bouillon!

  • Old Madame Pontellier - I loved this line below about Edna's children and their grandmother, because it made me think of my mom and G, and I think she shares the same sentiments.

She was hungry for them - even a little fierce in her attachment. She did not want them to be wholly 'children of the pavement', she always said when begging to have them for a space. She wished them to know the country, with its streams, its fields, its woods, its freedom, so delicious to the young. She wished them to taste something of the life their father had lived and known and loved when he, too, was a little child.

  • There was the whistle of a railway train somewhere in the distance, and the midnight bells were ringing. This one is just a personal note - I love hearing trains at night, and I love that I can hear them at home in the country and here in the city, depending on the level of overall city noise. I think my afterlife would always have a midnight bell and train in the distance.

Mrs. Edna Pontellier

Since she is really the center of this work, I wanted to give you a few lines to give you a sense of her. 

In appearance...

  • She was rather handsome than beautiful. I don't know if this is a compliment or a dig?
As a parent...
  • In short, Mrs. Pontellier was not a mother-woman.
  • She was fond of her children in an uneven, impulsive way. She would sometimes gather them passionately to her heart; she would sometimes forget them...Their absence was a sort of relief, though she did not admit this, even to herself. It seemed to free her of a responsibility which she had blindly assumed and for which Fate had not fitted her. I loved the exploration of this. I mean, certainly has dark ramifications for the children concerned, but I think it's under-explored to see mothers who didn't really intend to be, or don't feel it fits them completely.
As a wife...
  • The acme of bliss, which would have been a marriage with the tragedian, was not for her in this world. As the devoted wife of a man who worshiped her, she felt she would take her place with a certain dignity in the world of reality, closing the portals forever behind her upon the realm of romance and dreams. There was such sadness in this line.
  • When Madame Ratignolle says it's a pity Mr. Pontellier doesn't stay at home in the evening, and Edna replies: "Oh! dear no!,' said Edna, with a blank look in her eyes. 'What should I do if he stayed home? We wouldn't have anything to say to each other.' !! 

As a music enthusiast...

  • It was not the first time she had heard an artist at the piano. Perhaps it was the first time she was ready, perhaps the first time her being was tempered to take an impress of the abiding truth. Ooh, I loved this line, it gave me chills. Totally reminded me of the way Proust talks about music and music appreciation.

As a lover...

  • It was so much more natural to have him stay when he was not absolutely required to leave her. There was such poignancy in the relationship with Robert, which was really quite chaste on the whole, but also deeply intimate.
  • Robert's going had some way taken the brightness, the color, the meaning out of everything. The conditions of her life were in no way changed, but her whole existence was dulled, like a faded garment which seems to be no longer worth wearing.
As an individual...
  • She was becoming herself and daily casting aside that fictitious self which we assume like a garment with which to appear before the world. 
  • Whatever came, she had resolved never again to belong to another than herself. I loved this.

A doctor's opinion

Some people in this novel were less thrilled about Edna's awakening. For example, Mr. Pontellier. I really enjoyed this moment when he consulted the family doctor about Edna's "strange behavior" which included things like taking the streetcar and arriving home late at night, and paying no attention to household chores. 

  • Woman, my dear friend, is a very peculiar and delicate organism... And when ordinary fellows like you and me attempt to cope with their idiosyncrasies the result is bungling. Most women are moody and whimsical. OH YES, you know us women and how whimsical and moody we are. 

On ennui

Part of the beauty in this novel for me is this fine line between female independence, existential exploration, losing or finding oneself in love, and depression, and the uncertainty of where or what is driving this 'awakening'. Here are some of the lines that capture this feeling:

  • An indescribable oppression, which seemed to generate in some unfamiliar part of her consciousness, filled her whole being with a vague anguish. It was like a shadow, like a mist passing across her soul's summer day. It was strange and unfamiliar; it was a mood.
  • The beginning of things, of a world especially, is necessarily vague, tangled, chaotic, and exceedingly disturbing. How few of us ever emerge from such a beginning! How many souls perish in its tumult!
  • She had all her life long been accustomed to harbor thoughts and emotions which never voiced themselves.
  • There were days when she was unhappy, she did not know why, -when it did not seem worth while to be glad or sorry, to be alive or dead; when life appeared to her like a grotesque pandemonium and humanity like worms struggling blindly toward inevitable annihilation. This is admittedly a very dark line, but I liked the visceral nature of it, and how it reminded me of The Bell Jar, but also when Proust says things like, 'I was only unhappy for a day at a time.' 
  • 'The years that are gone seem like dreams - if one might go on sleeping and dreaming - but to wake up and find - oh! well! perhaps it is better to wake up after all, even to suffer, rather than to remain a dupe to illusions all one's life.' This is one of the central questions of the novel. Is it better to wake and find oneself in a sort of nightmare, or to stay sleeping and dreaming? 
On the sea
The way that Chopin writes about the water is so lovely. Here are some lines I loved.

  • The voice of the sea is seductive; never ceasing, whispering, clamoring, murmuring, inviting the soul to wander for a spell in abysses of solitude; to lose itself in mazes of inward contemplation.
  • She turned her face seaward to gather in an impression of space and solitude, which the vast expanse of water, meeting and melting with the moonlit sky, conveyed to her excited fancy. As she swam she seemed to be reaching out for the unlimited in which to lose herself.
Things I did not enjoy
While I really enjoyed this book on the whole, I'd like to take a moment to tell you about the bits I did not like. 
  • References to 'the quadroon' - there were no meaningful Black characters in this novel, and they were frequently referred to like this, by the 'proportion of their blackness'. I know this is representative of the time that Chopin inhabited, but it felt awful.
  • I couldn't help but reflect that there was not a huge gap between this novel and Black Boy in terms of timeline, so when I read the scenes of Edna's party and the Black folks working it, I thought of Richard going hungry behind the smiling white faces. 
  • The few times that Black people were mentioned, it was for things like this: A little black girl sat on the floor, and with her hands worked the treadle of the machine. Madame Lebrun is sewing and a little Black girl is literally on the floor pushing the machine. 
  • Comments about 'the Mexican people' as treacherous, their women as promiscuous - this came up as a theme several times. Obviously racist and ignorant.

Words that were new to me (many of which are actually French but a bit obscure)

befurbelowed - ornamented with frills

friandises - candies, sweet things

houri - a beautiful young woman, especially one of the virgin companions of the faithful in the Muslim Paradise

lateen - a triangular sail on a long yard at an angle of 45° to the mast

peignoir - a woman's light dressing gown or negligee

pirogue - a long, narrow canoe made from a single tree trunk, especially in Central America and the Caribbean

tabouret - a low stool or small table

Referents and Reverberations

  • I don't know if it was a particular scene as much as it was an overall feeling, but I got real echoes and reverberations of The Age of Innocence as I read this. I suppose The Age of Innocence is actually the echo, since it was published about 20 years later. ;)
  • There's a parrot in the opening scene, which reminded me of Dr. Urbino's parrot in Love in the Time of Cholera. It also reminded me of some ridiculous TikToks I've been watching that feature a yellow parrot that keeps saying to itself "Good Girl!" when it's obviously misbehaving. :)
  • This exchange:

Edna: How long will you be gone? 
Robert: Forever, perhaps. I don't know. It depends upon a good many things.
Edna: Well, in case it shouldn't be forever, how long will it be?
Robert: I don't know.

reminded me of A Farewell to Arms, and this scene: (I'm not sure why.)

 "What is it, darling?"
"It's all right, Cat. Would you like to get dressed right away and go in a boat to Switzerland?"
"Would you?"
"No. I'd like to go back to bed."
"What is it about?"
"The barman says they are going to arrest me in the morning."
"Is the barman crazy?"
"No."
"Then please hurry, darling, and get dressed so we can start."

  • The Ratignolles' soirées musicales reminded me of Proust, and the parties at the Verdurins and the musical accompaniments.

Lines I Particularly Liked

  • The sun was low in the west, and the breeze soft and languorous that came up from the south, charged with the seductive odor of the sea.
  • Her glance wandered from his face away toward the Gulf, whose sonorous murmur reached her like a loving but imperative entreaty.
  • She was flushed and felt intoxicated with the sound of her own voice and the unaccustomed taste of candor. It muddled her like wine, or like a first breath of freedom. This was one of my favorite lines.
  • The night sat lightly upon the sea and the land. There was no weight of darkness; there were no shadows. The white light of the moon had fallen upon the world like the mystery and the softness of sleep.
  • It was very pleasant to stay there under the orange trees, while the sun dipped lower and lower, turning the western sky to flaming copper and gold. The shadows lengthened and crept out like stealthy, grotesque monsters across the grass.
  • All the mystery and witchery of the night seemed to have gathered there amid the perfumes and the dusky and tortuous outlines of flowers and foliage. She was seeking herself and finding herself in just such sweet, half-darkness which met her moods. God, I love this line.
  • The future was a mystery which she never attempted to penetrate.
Well, my dear blobbies, I must away to another fictional experience, this time I'll look for sanctuary in Faulkner, I think (hagh). I'll leave you with a few lines I enjoyed. 

(1) The children were sent to bed. Some went submissively; others with shrieks and protests as they were dragged away. They had been permitted to sit up till after the ice-cream, which naturally marked the limit of human indulgence. Naturally. ;)

(2) The stillest hour of the night had come, the hour before dawn, when the world seems to hold its breath. My favorite time of day.

and (3) this exchange between Edna and Arobin about Mademoiselle Reisz, a quirky and talented pianist and friend: 
     
"'She says queer things sometimes in a bantering way that you don't notice at the time and you find yourself thinking about afterward.'  
 
'For instance?' 
 
'Well, for instance, when I left her to-day, she put her arms around me and felt my shoulder blades, to see if my wings were strong, she said. 'The bird that would soar above the level plain of tradition and prejudice must have strong wings. It is a sad spectacle to see the weaklings bruised, exhausted, fluttering back to earth.' Whither would you soar?'"

Perhaps our dear Edna did not remember to check on the strength of her wings in the end. So blobbies, if you plan on soaring above the plain of tradition and prejudice, don't forget to check your wings! And of course - don't let your arms get tired! ;)

Keep each other safe, keep faith, and have a wonderful evening, dear blobbies!

Monday, September 6, 2021

What quality of will must a Negro possess to live and die with dignity in a country that denied his humanity?

 Black Boy by Richard Wright

Spoiler Alert: Plot Summary

Black Boy is a poignant, often painful, brutally honest look at growing up as a young Black man in the Jim Crow South in the early 20th century. Wright takes us nearly all the way from infancy to his early twenties, and we follow him from place to place as his family (and later mostly his mother) looks for work and stability in a hostile world. We spend time in Mississippi, Tennessee, Arkansas, and later Chicago, and briefly New York City. While Wright is constantly surrounded by some family member, from a younger brother to various aunts and uncles and grandparents, his father leaves his mother early on in his youth, which makes the family income a constant struggle. Coupled with the existing state of poverty that his family finds themselves in, Wright spends a significant portion of his youth starving or scheming ways to get food. He bounces from place to place, his mother eventually falls ill (no doubt in some part due to the stress), and points out that he doesn't complete a single full year of schooling without a move until somewhere around 9th grade, I think. 

Despite having to work from a very young age to support his family, Wright manages to get to and through high school, and graduates first in his class. He has few options outside of teaching Black children, and though he wishes to go to college, it is not open to him. He decides to leave the South and moves first to Memphis and then Chicago, eventually saving enough money to bring his mother and brother along. He scrapes by, but things are always excruciatingly difficult, and as he develops his racial consciousness, he finds himself isolated both from whites and from his peers because he believes in racial equality and that Blacks should have rights, respect, jobs, education, etc. He struggles to keep jobs because they are always for whites and always involve degradation, whether implicit, explicit, or both. 

He eventually joins a Communist group which provides him with a community of more like-minded individuals, but he is still one of the few Black people in the group, and finds himself more and more at odds with them because he is branded an 'intellectual', which is counter to their worker mentality. He is eventually forced out of the group, and finds himself desirous of departing from them anyway, as he wants to devote himself to writing. While this is revolutionary for a Black man at the time, Wright carves out the space, time, and energy to practice writing and draft novels. We leave him contemplating the futility of this effort, but determined to write just the same.

Spoiler Over: Continue Here

Dear readers, 

It has been TOO LONG, I know. Many of you have probably forgotten about this blob, or wondered if I was, in fact, ever going to blob again. Well here I am! It took me a while because once again I got caught up reading a set of books I created for a book bingo, but I finally made it to this novel. It was definitely a tough read. Painful to hear and wear and share Wright's incredibly uphill battle of adolescence, and to wonder how much of the system and circumstances in this country have really changed for Black men since then. This is only the second Wright novel I've read - Native Son was on the blob list as well. I'd like to read more, though I would want to space them out, only because the content is so harrowing to navigate through. 

That said, there were many parts that resonated with me, so I'll share those with you now, and you can decide if and when you choose to explore this work for yourself. As usual, there's no particular order to them. 

On school and learning
Already my personality was lopsided; my knowledge of feeling was far greater than my knowledge of fact. I loved this line. It's painful, because it points out how much living he has been asked and forced to do before he is educated, but beautiful in its poignancy.

On selling papers but not reading them
For a while, Richard learns that he can get papers to read by selling them, much to his delight, as books are hard for him to come by. His friend says: 

'Hurry up and start selling 'em,' he urged me. 'I'd like to talk to you about the stories.' Which I thought was super endearing. The stories are in the magazine sections, and these are all that Richard reads, as he peddles the papers out to his community. One day, an older Black man finally points out to Richard that he's selling Klan propaganda; horrified, Richard reads the papers he's been selling and not reading, and realizes he has to stop immediately. This was such an intense and heartbreaking moment.

On writing
Richard, like many protagonists in writers' somewhat fictionalized autobiographies, is coming to being as a writer. Here are some of my favorite lines of his about writing. 

  • Nobody can tell me how or what to write.
  • My writing was my way of seeing, my way of living, my way of feeling; and who could change his sight, his notion of direction, his senses?
  • 'You'll have to prove your revolutionary loyalty.'
    'That's what I'm trying to do through writing.'
    'That's not the way to do it,' he said. 'You must act.' This tension was so beautifully explored, and felt so absurd and nonsensical. And yet, also so real - how many presidential candidates have been deemed 'too intellectual'? But I love that Wright's is a writing revolution, even if others can't see it.
Lines I loved

  • Were we all so mad that we could not detect a madman when we saw one? This is in reference to the fact that a new Communist Party member who has recently wreaked havoc on the group turns out to be an escapee from an insane asylum. 
  • 'Comrade Nealson,' I said, 'a writer who hasn't written anything worth-while is a most doubtful person. Now, I'm in that category. Yet I think I can write. I don't want to ask for special favors, but I'm in the midst of a book which I hope to complete in six months or so. Let me convince myself that I'm wrong about my hankering to write and then I'll be with you all the way.' I loved this exchange because it's very similar to how I feel as an aspiring/early writer. 
  • Writing had to be done in loneliness and Communism had declared war upon human loneliness.

  • Well, I would wait, day and night, until I knew what to say.
  • On going north and joining the Communists: I had fled men who did not like the color of my skin, and now I was among men who did not like the tone of my thoughts.
On being Black in America
Whenever I thought of the essential bleakness of black life in America, I knew that Negroes had never been allowed to catch the full spirit of Western civilization, that they somehow lived in it but not of it.

On hunger
Hunger is (sadly) a recurring them throughout the novel. What I loved was not that Richard was so often hungry, but how beautifully he captured this state of being. Here's one of my favorite scenes. 

When supper was over I saw that there were many biscuits piled high upon the bread platter, an astonishing and unbelievable sight to me. Though the biscuits were right before my eyes, and though there was more flour in the kitchen, I was apprehensive lest there be no bread for breakfast in the morning. I was afraid that somehow the biscuits might disappear during the night, while I was sleeping. I did not want to wake up in the morning, as I had done so often in the past, feeling hungry and knowing that there was no food in the house. So, surreptitiously, I took some of the biscuits from the platter and slipped them into my pocket, not to eat, but to keep as a bulwark against any possible attack of hunger. Even after I had got used to seeing the table loaded with food at each meal, I still stole bread and put it into my pockets.

I won't list every other way that hungerness and starvation are captured, but I will say that this topic included: Serving food to whites that Black folks were not allowed to eat themselves, eating leftovers from white lunch deliveries, living at an orphanage where they got only stale bread with molasses twice a day, and failing the postal exam because he weighed only 110 pounds as a young adult.

On fear
Another theme throughout the novel is the fear with which Richard lives his life as a Black boy in southern America. Again, while this is not something I celebrate, the way Wright describes it is painfully epic: 

When his uncle is lynched by white men for 'doing too well' at his business: 
There was no funeral. There was no music. There was no period of mourning. There were no flowers. There were only silence, quiet weeping, whispers, and fear. I did not know when or where Uncle Hoskins was buried. Aunt Maggie was not even allowed to see his body nor was she able to claim any of his assets. Uncle Hoskins had simply been plucked from our midst and we, figuratively, had fallen on our faces to avoid looking into that white-hot face of terror that we knew loomed somewhere above us. This was as close as white terror had ever come to me and my mind reeled. Why had we not fought back, I asked my mother, and the fear that was in her made her slap me into silence.

When Richard hears of other young men in his acquaintance being murdered by white men: The penalty of death awaited me if I made a false move and I wondered if it was worth-while to make any move at all. The things that influenced my conduct as a Negro did not have to happen to me directly; I needed but to hear of them to feel their full effects in the deepest layers of my consciousness. Indeed, the white brutality that I had not seen was a more effective control of my behavior than that which I knew.

And later, this exchange with his Black friend: 'Do you want to get killed?' he asked me. 
'Hell, no!'
'Then, for God's sake, learn how to live in the South!'

On social awkwardness
Poor Richard is bounced so many places within his family and the larger world as a boy, and whether his discomfort with social interaction is related to this or not is unclear, but it was adorable and hard to watch him try to navigate new homes. 

'Good morning, Richard,' Aunt Jody said. 
'Oh, good morning,' I mumbled, wishing that I had thought to say it first. 
'Don't people say good morning where you come from?' she asked.
'Yes, ma'am.'
'I thought they did,' she said pointedly. This reminded me of when my host dad in France always used to say 'Bon soir' or 'Bonjour' when he saw me, and somehow I always chose the wrong one. 

On learning whiteness protocol
Part of what makes this book and Richard as a person so incredible is that he stands outside the norm, and then shouts it from the rooftops. While this is revolutionary and stunning, it's also really hard for Richard. 

I knew what was wrong with me, but I could not correct it. The words and actions of white people were baffling signs to me. I was living in a culture and not a civilization and I could learn how that culture worked only by living with it. Misreading the reactions of whites around me made me say and do the wrong things. In my dealing with whites I was conscious of the entirety of my relations with them, and they were conscious only of what was happening at a given moment. I had to keep remembering what others took for granted; I had to think out what others felt. I had begun coping with the white world too late. I could not make subservience an automatic part of my behavior.

On battles on the home front
One of the most difficult parts of reading this book for me was how often Richard is beaten by members of his own family. I recognize that discipline in Black families is a super complex subject, and one in which I generally don't have the right to weigh in on, but it was really hard to read how often his mother, or his aunt, or his grandmother, or his uncle, or his father, wanted to beat him with a switch. I thought this line captured some of the chaotic nature of this: 

There were more violent quarrels in our deeply religious home than in the home of a gangster, a burglar, or a prostitute, a fact which I used to hint gently to Granny and which did my cause no good. Granny bore the standard for God, but she was always fighting. The peace that passes understanding never dwelt with us. I, too, fought; but I fought because I felt I had to keep from being crushed, to fend off continuous attack.

The sunken place
As Richard gets older, he struggles with watching how his own race responds to the white world. This reflection reminded me of the sunken place in Get Out: 

I began to marvel at how smoothly the black boys acted out the roles that the white race had mapped out for them. Most of them were not conscious of living a special, separate, stunted way of life. Yet I knew that in some period of their growing up - a period that they had no doubt forgotten - there had been developed in them a delicate, sensitive, controlling mechanism that shut off their minds and emotions from all that the white race had said was taboo. Although they lived in an America where in theory there existed equality of opportunity, they knew unerringly what to aspire to and what not to aspire to. Had a black boy announced that he aspired to be a writer, he would have been unhesitatingly called crazy by his pals.

On games
Richard, on watching other boys play craps at work: 

Gambling had never appealed to me. I could not conceive of any game holding more risks than the life I was living. Man, this line gets me. 

On talking to southern white men
Code-switching and navigating racially charged conversation is, I'm sure, still extremely prevalent for Black folks, but it was part of literally every interaction for Richard. I loved this line from an exchange with a southern white man, because it made it clear how many landmines there were all around Wright conversationally: 

Was this a trap? He had mentioned a tabooed subject and I wanted to wait until I knew what he meant. Among the topics that southern white men did not like to discuss with Negroes were the following: American white women; the Ku Klux Klan; France, and how Negro soldiers fared while there; Frenchwomen; Jack Johnson; the entire northern part of the United states; the Civil War; Abraham Lincoln; U.S. Grant; General Sherman; Catholics; the Pope; Jews; the Republican party; slavery; social equality; Communism; Socialism; the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution; or any topic calling for positive knowledge or manly self-assertion on the part of the Negro. The most accepted topics were sex and religion.

On empathy
I've written on this blog before about how much I love that books and reading instill empathy in readers. I thought Wright's exploration of this was fascinating and challenging:

As dawn broke I ate my pork and beans, feeling dopey, sleepy. I went to work, but the mood of the book would not die; it lingered, coloring everything I saw, heard, did. I now felt that I knew what the white men were feeling. Merely because I had read a book that had spoken of how they lived and thought, I identified myself with that book. I felt vaguely guilty. Would I, filled with bookish notions, act in a manner that would make the whites dislike me. 

On the difficulty of getting books to read
Richard has to work SO HARD to get books in his hands (he ends up getting a white co-worker to share his library card, but still has to fake notes and pretend he's getting books for the man) but I love the way he describes reading: 

Reading was like a drug, a dope. The novels created moods in which I lived for days. But I could not conquer my sense of guilt, my feeling that the white men around me knew that I was changing, that I had begun to regard them differently.

Crossovers
As I've said many times before on this blog, I never cease to be amazed at how each book touches or intersects with my life somehow, no matter how seemingly disparate our worlds are. This book was no exception, whether it was Richard's response to his deeply religious upbringing and school companions, to the books he reads (he reads Stein's Three Lives, which I just read for this blog), or the way he feels about writing, I felt a lot of kinship with Richard. I think the most intense example of this for me was when he read Proust, which my blobbist readers will know I have a deep affection for after having read it for this blog:  

I spent my nights reading Proust's A Remembrance of Things Past, admiring the lucid, subtle but strong prose, stupefied by its dazzling magic, awed by the vast, delicate, intricate, and psychological structure of the Frenchman's epic of death and decadence. But it crushed me with hopelessness, for I wanted to write of the people in my environment with an equal thoroughness, and the burning example before my eyes made me feel that I never could. Richard, I think many have likely already said this, but you absolutely have done that. You have given your people that same thoroughness, and you are your own burning example for us to live up to.

Referents & Reverberations

I like to call out places where this work speaks to works that came before or after, at least in my head. 

There were several places and times when Richard had to fight his family or his environment so hard to be able to read, and these reminded me of both Proust as a young boy and Scout, in To Kill a Mockingbird. 

These moments from this work: 

  • On talking to a woman, Ella, and eventually getting her to read him some of Bluebeard and His Seven Wives - 'Your grandmother wouldn't like it if I talked to you about novels.'
  • On the helpfulness of his grandmother's illiteracy because her religious nature makes her wary of all books: Oh, boy, how lucky it was for me that Granny could not read!
  • My excessive reading puzzled Aunt Maggie; she sensed my fiercely indrawn nature and she did not like it. Being of an open, talkative disposition, she declared that I was going about the business of living wrongly, that reading books would not help me at all. 
Reminded me of these moments: 
  • In To Kill a Mockingbird, when Scout gets in trouble for reading too much at school, and reflects: Until I feared I would lose it, I never loved to read. One does not love breathing.
  • And in Remembrance of Things Past, when the young boy's great aunt comments: What! still amusing yourself with a book? It isn't Sunday, you know! because she thinks reading is only appropriate on a day of rest.

The other book this novel reminded me of, which obviously came after it, was The Autobiography of Malcolm X. This interaction in Black Boy: 

'Well, I want to be a writer,' I mumbled, unsure of myself; I had not planned to tell her that, but she had made me feel so utterly wrong and of no account that I needed to bolster myself.
'A what?' she demanded. 
'A writer,' I mumbled.
'For what?'
'To write stories,' I mumbled defensively. 
'You'll never be a writer,' she said. 'Who on earth put such ideas into your n* head?' 
'Nobody,' I said.
'I didn't think anybody ever would,' she declared indignantly.'

Reminded me of this moment in The Autobiography of Malcolm X, when Malcolm tells his favorite teacher he wants to be a lawyer: 

You've got to be realistic about being a n*. A lawyer - that's no realistic goal for a n*. You need to think about something you can be. You're good with your hands - making things. Everybody admires your carpentry shop work. Why don't you plan on carpentry?

The difference in time was maybe 40 years, but how many Black children (and Black boys, in particular) are still being told by their largely white teachers that they can't be what they want to be? We all bear the responsibility of breaking this narrative.

Lines in the running for title of this blog

  • How could I ever learn this strange world of white people?
  • Was I always to hang on the fringes of life?
  • Could a Negro ever live halfway like a human being in this goddamn country?

Whew. Well I know this has been a lengthy post, but I hope you have enjoyed it! I'll leave you with three final thoughts from Mr. Wright. 

(1) I think his reflections on America are SO spot-on, and particularly relevant and telling as we look back at the last few years. Here's a somewhat condensed version of this, underlining my own.

I feel that for white America to understand the significance of the problem of the Negro will take a bigger and tougher America than any we have yet known. I feel that America's past is too shallow, her national character too superficially optimistic, her very morality too suffused with color hate for her to accomplish so vast and complex a task...Therefore if, within the confines of its present culture, the nation ever seeks to purge itself of its color hate, it will find itself at war with itself, convulsed by a spasm of emotional and moral confusion...Our too-young and too-new America, lusty because it is lonely, aggressive because it is afraid, insists upon seeing the world in terms of good and bad, the holy and the evil, the high and the low, the white and the black; our America is frightened of fact, of history, of processes, of necessity. It hugs the easy way of damning those whom it cannot understand, of excluding those who look different, and it salves its conscience with a self-draped cloak of righteousness. Am I damning my native land? No; for I, too, share these faults of character! And I really do not think that America, adolescent and cocksure, a stranger to suffering and travail, an enemy of passion and sacrifice, is ready to probe into its most fundamental beliefs.

(2) I love that Richard is so willing and so desperate to fight for the right to write, even when society is trying so hard to exclude him from the space. Here's how he ends the novel: 

I would hurl words into this darkness and wait for an echo, and if an echo sounded, no matter how faintly, I would send other words to tell, to march, to fight, to create a sense of the hunger for life that gnaws in us all, to keep alive in our hearts a sense of the inexpressibly human.

(3) And last, but not least, I'll leave you with this exchange between Richard and his classmates after his fiction story is published in a paper, which so brilliantly typifies the idea that writers don't write because they want to or they're told to, they write because they HAVE to. 

'Did you really write that story?' they asked me. 
'Yes.'
'Why?'
'Because I wanted to.'
'Where did you get it from?'
'I made it up.'
'You didn't. You copied it out of a book.'
'If I had, no one would publish it.'
'But what are they publishing it for?'
'So people can read it.'
'Who told you to do that?'
'Nobody.'
'Then why did you do it?'
'Because I wanted to.'

So write because you must, read because it makes us feel each other's lives in a way that is not otherwise possible or plausible, and if you're in a country that celebrates it, enjoy this day of Labor which we celebrate with time off. I really will try not to take so long to blob on the next book, I promise! Stay safe, keep faith, and good night. 

Wednesday, May 19, 2021

Most women were interfering in their ways.

 Three Lives by Gertrude Stein

Spoiler Alert: Plot Summary

Three Lives is a set of three discrete stories - The Good Anna, Melanctha, and The Gentle Lena - and each story follows the life of the titular person. The lives are distinct, if in many ways unremarkable, and do not seem (imho) to be connected at all. 

Spoiler Over: Continue Here

If it was not clear from my extremely short summary, I did not care for this book. I wanted to like Gertrude Stein, perhaps for no other reason than a romantic memory of her oft-quoted, "America is my country, and Paris is my hometown." 

The first story was fine, if uninspiring, but the second story was so blatantly racist it took me WEEKS to get through it. The whole thing together is only 200 pages, and we know I've tackled FAR longer works than that in less time, but it was just so painful to read it was excruciating. This is probably the closest I've come to not finishing a book for this blob. 

And sure, yes, Gertrude Stein, like anyone, was a product of her time, and there are some who say that as a lesbian and a Jew, her outsider's perspective on race is more nuanced than a simple ascription of 'that's so racist'. But let's just say I'm not one of those people. The middle story, Melanctha, is about a mixed race woman who is Black and white, and it's chock full of denigrating comments and preposterous broad statements about 'colored people' and other offensive terms, and I can't for the life of me understand why Stein felt compelled to tell the story of someone whom she held in such obvious disregard FROM HER POINT OF VIEW. Weirdly all three of these stories were intimate but not fully letting you in to the person being described, which made them (a) BORING and (b) hard to connect to. So sure, maybe it was revolutionary and all, and I'll have to check out The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas, which is about Stein's partner, but on the whole, I am left feeling deeply un-wowed. 

Here are a few snippets from each 'life': 

The Good Anna

  • It was some months now that Anna had been intimate with Mrs. Drehten. I thought the casual lesbianism was cool, and I'm sure very revolutionary in its time. 
  • It was wonderful how Mrs. Lehntman could listen and not hear, could answer and yet not decide, could say and do what she was asked and yet leave things as they were before. I thought this was a great sentence. 
  • She hired Lizze for a second girl to be with her and soon they were all content. All except the parrot, for Miss Mathilda did not like its scream. lololol. I lived briefly in a house with parakeets, and I must admit I was also not a fan of their screams.
Melanctha

  • Melanctha Herbert was always losing what she had in wanting all the things she saw. Melanctha was always being left when she was not leaving others. 
  • Melanctha Herbert was always seeking rest and quiet, and always she could only find new ways to be in trouble.
  • Melanctha Herbert had always had a break neck courage.
  • Melanctha needed badly a man to content her. Melanctha also needed badly to have a name that felt less trip-worthy on the tongue, imo. I mean, everyone should have a name that feels right to them and I support all names and cultures around naming, etc. etc., but that C in the middle just kept gumming up my mental pronunciation and it did NOT help the whole already hating the racism of the story thing.

The Gentle Lena

Am I the only one who noticed that Lena and Anna, anglo-Europeans, get positive adjective descriptors, and Melanctha just gets her name in the title? 

  • Lena was patient, gentle, sweet, and German.
  • Poor Lena was so scared and weak, and every minute she was sure that she would die.
  • Lena went home all alone, and cried in the street car. Oh yeah, did I mention that on top of being mostly boring, both Melanctha and Lena were just MISERABLE for basically their whole lives and frequently discussed suicide or 'disappearing into death'? So that was super fun, too. 
  • Lena never seemed to hear what anyone was saying to her.

Terms That Were New To Me:

Struldbrug - Okay, so I read Gulliver's Travels for this blog, so I must have known this term at some point, but I had forgotten. Stein makes a casual reference to it, so I'm sharing the reference below: 

"In Jonathan Swift's novel Gulliver's Travels, the name struldbrug is given to those humans in the nation of Luggnagg who are born seemingly normal, but are in fact immortal. However, although struldbrugs do not die, they do nonetheless continue aging. Swift's work depicts the evil of immortality without eternal youth. They are easily recognized by a red dot above their left eyebrow. They are normal human beings until they reach the age of thirty, at which time they become dejected. Upon reaching the age of eighty they become legally dead, and suffer from many ailments including the loss of eyesight and the loss of hair. Struldbrugs are forbidden to own property. As soon as they have completed the term of eighty years, they are looked on as dead in law; their heirs immediately succeed to their estates; only a small pittance is reserved for their support; and the poor ones are maintained at the public charge. After that period, they are held incapable of any employment of trust or profit; they cannot purchase lands, or take leases; neither are they allowed to be witnesses in any cause, either civil or criminal."

Well, blob friends, here's hoping that by the time we connect again the world looks a bit more open and still safe. I'm off to Richard Wright, and have much higher expectations of enjoyment of his work. Happy reading!

Saturday, March 20, 2021

Maybe a man has to sell his soul to get the power to do good.

All the King's Men by Robert Penn Warren

Spoiler Alert: Plot Summary

We're in the deep South, in the 1920's, I believe, and we're following the trajectory of one Willie Talos, originally a country boy who becomes a supremely powerful politician (and Governor of the state). It's not stated clearly, I don't think, but I believe it is Louisiana, and my mother tells me that the story is a sort of fictionalized memoir of Huey Long, who perhaps you know of (I did not). Willie Talos, aka the Boss, cares about his community, but also enjoys the machinery and machinations of politicking, and eventually his varied interests and commitments (and a bit of incestuous intertangling) gets him kilt. Our story is told to us by Jack Burden, a newspaper man who finds himself attached to Willie Talos and his political machine. We see the shift from dedicated statesman to power-hungry egotist, and follow the perils, pitfalls, and triumphs along the way.

Spoiler Over: Continue Here 

Dear blobbists, 

I can't believe it's been something like five months since I blobbed! Here's the secret: I've been reading behind your back. You see, I started doing these book bingos a few summers back, and I got totally hooked on the concept. So when this new year started, I was working on two bingos - one to celebrate (last year's) Day of the Dead and one to celebrate Intersectional Feminism. So you see, since we've last connected, it's not like I have only read this one book (although, to be fair, ATKM was a long one). I've actually read something like...37? 

So yeah. I'm going to do a blog post at some point about all the book bingos, because they've been a delightful romp and serve as an excellent distraction from ye ole pandemmy-ennui. But for now I'll tell you a bit more about my experience with this book!

I liked this book. I'm not sure that I got the same resonance from it that folks got who knew the context of Huey Long and that moment in time, but there were certainly still some very beautiful parts of it. It apparently won the Pulitzer prize and got made into multiple movies and such, which feels like kind of a lot to me, but I guess people were really into it! 

I didn't love some things, like the frequent use of the n-word, the obvious racism, the erasure of black identity, and the lack of any real, meaningful female characters who weren't sexually connected to the men. But here are some of things I did like. 

On the sentence and paragraph structure - neither wholly circuitous nor direct

If I was going to try to describe Robert Penn Warren's writing style, I think it would go something like this. Hemingway meets Joyce in the middle of the street, and just as they're almost across the road they tumble into Proust, who laboriously joins them. There's something sort of stream of consciousness, but also straightforward, about the prose, that I found lilting and enchanting, and made me see why it was a hit. I tried to find a few good examples. Here they are: 

Perhaps that was the moment when Slade made his fortune. How life is strange and changeful, and the crystal is in the steel at the point of fracture, and the toad bears a jewel in its forehead, and the meaning of moments passes like the breeze that scarcely ruffles the leaf of the willow.

There wasn't any sound for what must have been three seconds, but seemed like a week while a mourning dove down in the clump of trees in the bottom where the hogs were gave a couple of tries at breaking his heart and mine. I really loved this line. 

Inside the court house, where the big hall was empty and shadowy and the black oily floor was worn down to humps and ridges under your feet and the air was dry and dusty so that you felt in the stillness that you were breathing into yourself the last shrunk-up whispers still hanging in the air from all the talk, loud and little, there had been in there for seventy-five years - well, inside there, just off the hall I saw some men sitting in a room. 

On the narrator - muckraker, dirt-digger, truth-teller

I suspect (and will have to settle for suspecting, because you know I don't like to research too much about my books) that the author wrote from Jack Burden's perspective because it mirrored his experience. In any case, the storytelling angle is very powerful, because we're just behind the veil of this monolith, Willie Talos, and his political engine. Here are some Jack lines I liked: 

A man's got to carry something besides a corroded liver with him out of that dark backward and abysm of time, and it might as well be the little black books.

I was supposed to do a lot of different things, and one of them was to lift up fifteen-year-old, hundred-and-thirty-five-pound hairy, white dogs on summer afternoons and paint an expression of unutterable bliss upon their faithful features as they gaze deep, deep into the Boss's eyes. 

On being on vacation - from yourself

There's a fair amount of existentialism, which really reminded me of Proust's reflections. Here's one of my favorites: 

They say you are not you except in terms of relation to other people. If there weren't any other people there wouldn't be any you because what you do, which is what you are, only has meaning in relation to other people. That is a very comforting thought when you are in the car in the rain at night alone, for then you aren't you, and not being you or anything, you can really lie back and get some rest. It is a vacation from being you. 

On multiple yous - the you which you just left in one place and the you which you will be when you get to the other place

And this one: 

You ought to invite those two you's to the same party, some time. Or you might have a family reunion for all the you's with barbecue under the trees. It would be amusing to know what they would say to each other. Oh, very. Oh, rather. Oh, definitely. Oh, yes, indeed. hehehe.

On Model-Ts - their form and function

I just thought it was amazing that they were driving Model-T's because they were new vehicles, since my only image of a Model-T is the one my next-door neighbor growing up, Mr. Light, has been tinkering at forever. I still remember him occasionally popping into the tiny little car and driving around the street on the rare occasions that it was in working order. 

On sitting with the old ones - on a bench in the town square

I loved this description of Jack's when he goes to find some dirt and sits in the town square with 'the old ones' of the town: Time and motion cease to be. It is like sniffing ether, and everything is sweet and sad and far away.

On dress - just like Zoom

At one point, someone's look is described as: Town from the waist up, country from the waist down. Get both votes. 

I loved it because it made me think of the way we dress in the pandemic - business from the waist up, and jammies from the waist down, more often than not. ;)

On persimmons - here, there, and everywhere

I loved this line: But is any relationship a relationship in time and only in time? I eat a persimmon and the teeth of a tinker in Tibet are put on edge. The flower-in-the-crannied-wall theory. We have to accept it because so often our teeth are on edge from persimmons we didn't eat. Do you find this is the case, reader? Are your teeth on edge from the persimmon you didn't eat today?

Referents and Reverberations

This book reminded me of several books. Initially, it definitely rang of...

  • Atlas Shrugged - naming, cronyism
  • Faulkner - any and all
  • The Heart is a Lonely Hunter, Carson McCullers
  • On the Road, Jack Kerouac - the line below, in particular - 

So they sat there in there common knowledge, while the chunk on the heart stewed and hissed and crumpled, and were together in the down-beat and pause of the rhythm of their lives. 

Reminded me of lines like this one: 

Are we straight in the deepest and most wonderful depths of our souls, dear darling? 

  • Proust - so many lines reminded me of In Search of Lost Time/Remembrance of Things Passed. Here's one: 

The grandfather's clock in the corner of the room, I suddenly realized, wasn't getting any younger. It would drop out a tick, and the tick would land inside my head like a rock dropped in a well, and the ripples would circle out and stop, and the tick would sink down the dark. For a piece of time which was not long or short, and might not even be time, there wouldn't be anything. Then the tock would drop down the well, and the ripples would circle out and finish. I love this line because we have a grandmother clock in my mom's house that isn't getting any younger and tends to lose time over the week, and we also had many metronomes that swung a bit heavily to one side. This reminded me of both of those things. 

  • The Master and Margarita, Mikhail Bulgakov - this passage describing love - 

We didn't say a word, but some afternoons I read to Anne. I read the first book I had laid hand to the first afternoon when I found I couldn't sit there any longer in that silence which bulged and creaked with all the unsaid words. It was the first volume of the works of Anthony Trollope. That was a safe bet. Anthony never upset any equilibriums. 

In a peculiar way those late autumn days began to remind me of the summer almost twenty years before when I had fallen in love with Anne. That summer we had been absolutely alone, together, even when people were around, the only inhabitants of the kind of floating island or magic carpet which being in love is. And now we were absolutely alone, but it was a different kind of floating island or magic carpet. That summer we had seemed to be caught in a massive and bemusing tide which knew its own pace and time and would not be hurried even to the happiness which it surely promised. And now again we seemed to be caught in such a tide and couldn't lift a finger in its enormous drift, for it knew its own pace and time. But what it promised we didn't know. I did not even wonder. 

Reminded me of one of my favorite scenes from The Master and Margarita: 

During the Maytime storms, when streams of water gushed noisily past the blurred windows, threatening to flood their last refuge, the lovers would light the stove and bake potatoes. The potatoes steamed, and their charred skins blackened their fingers. There was laughter in the basement, and in the garden the trees would shed broken twigs and white clusters of flowers after the rain." 

Words I didn't know (or maybe knew at some point but forgot)

catalpa - Catalpa, commonly called catalpa or catawba, is a genus of flowering plants in the family Bignoniaceae, native to warm temperate and subtropical regions of North America, the Caribbean, and East Asia

litotes - ironic understatement in which an affirmative is expressed by the negative of its contrary (e.g., you won't be sorry, meaning you'll be glad ) - I feel like I knew this for the GRE or the SAT, but forgot. ;)

lob-lolly - a porridge or stew, coming to mean swamp. It is used in the names of: Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), a tree. Loblolly-bay (Gordonia lasianthus), a tree. Loblolly boy, an assistant to a ship's surgeon.

sebaceous - relating to oil or fat [this one's from the Latin, Mom, so I should have known that - 'sebum', meaning tallow']

thunder-mug - old slang for a chamber pot

Lines I Liked

  • What they had in common was a world of wordless silence by the fire.
  • So I decorously withdrew my gaze from the pair, and resumed my admiration of the dying day on the other side of the hog lot and the elegiac landscape.
  • Her face was girlish, with soft, soothing contours and large deep brown eyes, the kind that make you think of telling secrets in the gloaming.
  • If something takes too long, something happens to you. You become all and only the thing you want and nothing else, for you have paid too much for it, too much in wanting and too much in waiting and too much in getting.
  • There is nothing like a good book to put you to sleep with the illusion that life is rich and meaningful.
  • By the time I got out to my car, the sky was curdling blue with dawn.

I'm off to play a rousing game of Wingspan with seesters (if you haven't played it, you really should, #birdlover) but I'll leave you with this, one of my favorite passages. It reminded me a bit of how I think we're starting to feel as we begin to creep at the edges of an ending to the pandemic. 

I drifted over to the window back of the Boss's desk and looked out over the grounds. It had rained during the night and now in the weak sunlight the grass and the leaves of the live oaks, even the trailing moss, had a faint sheen, and the damp concrete of the curving drives and walks gave off an almost imperceptible, glimmering reflection. The whole world, the bare boles of the other trees, which had lost their leaves now, the roofs of the houses, even the sky itself, had a pale, washed, relieved look, like the look on the face of a person who has been sick a long time and now feels better and thinks maybe he is going to get well.

Sending everyone (and especially the AAPI community) love, health, rest, relaxation, and comfort. I'm on to Gertrude Stein.